<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Laser Chronicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fadefast.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog</link>
	<description>The blog behind the machines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2500th Treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/2500th-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/2500th-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dru Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Tattoo Lightening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint's and Sinners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today we passed our 2500 treatment.  As it turned out, we did the 2500th removal session on one of our local tattooers, eJay from Saint&#8217;s and Sinner&#8217;s Tattoo. You might ask.  Why would a tattoo artist want laser removal?  The answer is simple.  By using a laser to lighten a tattoo, we can give our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today we passed our 2500 treatment.  As it turned out, we did the 2500th removal session on one of our local tattooers, eJay from <a href="http://www.myspace.com/sandstattoo">Saint&#8217;s and Sinner&#8217;s Tattoo</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fadefast.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/tigersword3.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.fadefast.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/tigersword3-e1280532987151.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-115" title="Saints and Sinners" src="http://www.fadefast.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/tigersword3-e1280532987151.jpg" alt="Saints and Sinners" width="500" height="184" /></a></p>
<p>You might ask.  Why would a tattoo artist want laser removal?  The answer is simple.  By using a laser to lighten a tattoo, we can give our clients the option to have the old tattoo covered with a better piece in as little as 2-4 treatments. Because of this, we actually have huge client base of tattoo artists.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fadefast.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/YS3gns.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-117" title="Dru Bias" src="http://www.fadefast.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/YS3gns-e1280533657925.jpg" alt="Dru Bias" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>Of course we are happy to fully remove tattoos as well.  Laser lightening is simply just one option for our clients to fix their bad tattoos with fewer treatments and by spending less money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/2500th-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laser Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/laser-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/laser-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Focus Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoya Conbio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lutronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxim Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medlite C3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medlite C6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaturaLase 2J]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaturaLase QS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palomar QYAG5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QX Max]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revlite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectrum VRM III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After spending over 4 months testing different lasers on the market, Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal decided to upgrade our Palomar QYAG5 to the Focus Medical NaturaLase QS 2J. With so many lasers on the market all having pretty hefty price tags it was a long, tedious and expensive process. In the end we spent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After spending over 4 months testing different lasers on the market, Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal decided to upgrade our Palomar QYAG5 to the Focus Medical <a href="http://focusmedical.com/naturalase_qs.html">NaturaLase QS 2J</a>. With so many lasers on the market all having pretty hefty price tags it was a long, tedious and expensive process. In the end we spent over $20,000 in research costs, but the hands-on experience was worth every penny. Below is a list of the machines we tested and a bit of information on each.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/comp.jpg" alt="Laser Comparison" width="500" height="186" /></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="10" width="500" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/Revlite200.jpg" alt="Hoya Conbio Revlite" width="200" height="298" /></td>
<td>Hoya Conbio&#8217;s Revlite was the first system we tested. Actually, it was the second time we had the machine in our office (we did a side-by-side comparison with the QYAG5 a year and half ago.) However, this time we treated significantly more clients. The verdict: Conbio makes good solid machines. There is a reason that both the Revlite and its predecessor, the C6, are often called the &#8220;Gold Standard&#8221; of laser tattoo removal. Overall the results were good and the local sales guys (Maxim Laser) were fantastic.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="10" width="500" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>The next laser that we tested was the Lutronic Spectrum VRM III. Again, a good solid machine. Putting it through the paces, it compared very closely to the Revlite. There were several pros and cons but overall the main things that made the machine most attractive were a lower cost and a longer warranty. If we had stopped our testing at this point, I think Lutronic would have been our new machine, but we pushed forward researching more equipment.</td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/Lutronic200.jpg" alt="Lutronic Spectrum VRM III" width="200" height="298" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="10" width="500" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/NaturaLase200.jpg" alt="Focus Medical NaturaLase QS 2J" width="200" height="298" /></td>
<td>Laser number three that came to our office was the Focus Medical NaturaLase QS 2J. This machine is unlike any other laser on the market. The hand piece allows for more settings. It has external calibration. But, the real selling point on the laser is power. It produces twice the power of both the Revlite and the Spectrum VRM III in single pulse Q-switched mode. In laymen&#8217;s terms this means faster, more effective, and ultimately less treatments for the clients. Also, because of the increased power, the NaturaLase QS 2J is twice as effective in treating blue and green ink, which has always been the shortcoming for Nd:YAG lasers.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellpadding="10" width="500" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Finally, we tested the Fotona QX Max. This laser really is in a class all its own. It&#8217;s a 1.6J machine, which means that it produces 60% more power than most of the Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers on the market. The machine is tiny and seems to be very well built. The hand piece is similar in functionality to the NaturaLase and is extremely light and ergonomic. It even has the option of a wireless foot pedal. Of all the lasers we tested, this was one of the most impressive and is still one of our favorites on the market.</td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/Fotona200.jpg" alt="Fotona QX Max" width="200" height="298" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It took over a month of deliberation, but in the end we chose the Focus Medical NaturaLase QS 2J. Every machine we tested would have made an excellent addition to the business, but ultimately, it is all about power. If our practice included skin tightening, acne treatments, vascular lesion treatments, etc, then we might have chosen a different machine. However, Fade Fast only does laser tattoo removal. The speed and the power of the NaturaLase 2J just can&#8217;t be rivaled.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/NaturaLaseA.jpg" alt="Focus Medical NaturaLase 2J" width="467" height="695" /></p>
<p>Furthermore our decision was based on the future research, development and training that Focus Medical offered with the laser. Our technician, Allen Falkner, has visited the manufacturing facility twice, was trained to service the machine and still works closely with laser designer. What does this mean for our clients? By understanding the physics, inner workings and operational parameters of the laser, we can provide more customized treatments for our individual clients and ultimately give them better and faster results.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/NaturaLaseside.jpg" alt="Focus Medical NaturaLase 2J" width="400" height="193" /></p>
<p>Update: It has been two months since we integrated the NaturaLase 2J into our business and the results have been phenomenal, but that&#8217;s not all. Due to the increased power and huge ten-millimeter spot size, sessions have been 4 to 6 times faster than our older laser. Also, compared to some 450mJ systems, such as the Medlite C3, the NaturaLase 2J can, in some cases, reduce the time per session by as much 1/10th.*</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/spotsizes.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="140" height="80" /></p>
<p>*1/10th reduction is a comparison of area treated per laser pulse &#8211; 6.5mm spot size (33.17 mm squared) to a 2mm spot size (3.14 mm squared)</p>
<p>For more information on the machines such as in depth comparisons, energy outputs per spot size, and final results of our trials, please feel free to contact us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/laser-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big News</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/big-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/big-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Removal Dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Look]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Look Laser Tattoo Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tattoo Removal Dallas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Saturday November 14th, New Look Laser Tattoo Removal closed their Dallas clinic to focus on their training and consulting projects. The following is the announcement letter sent out to all of their Dallas clients: New Look is pleased to announce a significant change in our Dallas clinic.  We are handing over our Dallas laser [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Saturday November 14th, New Look Laser Tattoo Removal closed their Dallas clinic to focus on their <a href="http://www.newlooklasercollege.com/">training</a> and consulting projects. The following is the announcement letter sent out to all of their Dallas clients:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/NLLTR.gif" alt="New Look Laser Tattoo Removal" width="477" height="118" /></p>
<p>New Look is pleased to announce a significant change in our Dallas clinic.  We are handing over our Dallas laser tattoo removal practice to allow ourselves time to focus on laser tattoo removal training and consulting projects.</p>
<p>Starting today, we are referring our patients to Mr. Allen Falkner, owner and laser specialist at Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal.  For years, Mr. Falkner has been a leading competitor and we could think of no one more capable than he to service our clients.  Not only does his practice use the latest equipment and well-regarded protocols, but it contributes to the tattoo removal industry through research, presentations at conferences, and volunteer work.</p>
<p>You can reach Fade Fast at 214-394-6824, where they have appointments available between 1pm and 9pm, Tuesday through Saturday.  Their office is located at 9012 Garland Road, Dallas TX 75218 and their website is <a href="http://www.FadeFast.com">www.FadeFast.com</a>.  Please call and they’ll be happy to schedule an appointment for you.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Lynette Kennedy, FNP and Ryan Lambert<br />
<a href="http://www.newlookhouston.com/">http://www.newlookhouston.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/big-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tattoo Ink Study</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/tattoo-ink-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/tattoo-ink-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Tattoo Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tattoo ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tattoo Removal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently we put together a study to determine how different laser wavelengths interact with particular colors and more specifically different brands of tattoo inks. This test was designed to present empirical data proving or disproving the following statements: Presently the four most common wavelengths that are used to remove tattoos are: 1064nm (infrared light) is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently we put together a study to determine how different laser wavelengths interact with particular colors and more specifically different brands of tattoo inks. This test was designed to present empirical data proving or disproving the following statements:</p>
<p align="center">Presently the four most common wavelengths that are used to remove tattoos are:<br />
1064nm (infrared light) is absorbed by black and most other ink colors<br />
650nm, 694nm, 755nm (red light) are absorbed by green ink<br />
585nm (yellow light) is absorbed by blue ink<br />
532nm (green light) is absorbed by red ink</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/colorwheel.jpg" alt="color wheel" width="500" height="169" /></p>
<p>The study was also designed to further determine the interactions of each wavelength on nonstandard or mixed colors such as orange, teal, purple, etc. In addition, the effectiveness of infrared light (1064nm) was tested on all colors to determine the absorption rates in comparison to the standard complimentary colors. Ex: Green absorbs Red Light.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GelPlates2.jpg" alt="color gel plates" width="500" height="141" /></p>
<p>Many of the inks did conform to the generally accepted light absorption archetype. However, some colors did not and produced some very surprising results. The outcome of this preliminary test identified some interesting ink interactions with every wavelength; most notably the less commonly used 585 (yellow) wavelength.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/purples.jpg" alt="purple ink" width="500" height="342" /></p>
<p>High resolution photos were taken and cataloged to show each ink&#8217;s interaction for side-by-side comparisons. All of the data produced by this study will be available during our lecture at The Biggest Tattoo Show on Earth, October 3rd at the Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas Nevada:</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.tattooexpo09.com/seminar.php?id=18">http://www.tattooexpo09.com/seminar.php?id=18</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/tattoo-ink-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big 1500</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/the-big-1500/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/the-big-1500/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Tattoo Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tattoo Removal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick blog entry to announce that on August 21st we passed another huge milestone. We completed our 1500th treatment on one of our favorite clients. Thank you Sunshine for making the long trip to Dallas and trusting us to perform your laser tattoo removal procedures.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick blog entry to announce that on August 21st we passed another huge milestone. We completed our 1500th treatment on one of our favorite clients.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GS3hrtB.jpg"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GS3hrtT.jpg" alt="Laser Tattoo Removal" width="450" height="338" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Thank you Sunshine for making the long trip to Dallas and trusting us to perform your laser tattoo removal procedures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/the-big-1500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White Tattoos</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/white-tattoos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/white-tattoos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Starbrite Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titanium Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Tattoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the sun fade white tattoos?  The answer is actually quote complex and here&#8217;s why: First, think of tattoo ink like paint that is being used to cover a pinkish red wall. If the wall were painted black it&#8217;s highly possible that it could be covered in one coat. If it were painted white it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the sun fade white tattoos?  The answer is actually quote complex and here&#8217;s why:</p>
<p>First, think of tattoo ink like paint that is being used to cover a pinkish red wall.  If the wall were painted black it&#8217;s highly possible that it could be covered in one coat.  If it were painted white it would take numerous coats, or the case of tattooing packing in the color.  (This is why covering a dark tattoo with a lighter one is almost impossible)  Also, besides &#8220;masking&#8221; any underlying color of the skin, the ink is still under the body&#8217;s natural melanin. (This is why darker skinned people cannot get light tattoos)</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/TiO2.jpg" alt="Titanium Dioxide" width="330" height="336" /></p>
<p>Physics and Biology:<br />
Just like melanin, tattoo ink will block and/or absorb radiation.  Commonly white inks contain Titanium Dioxide.  Ti02 in it&#8217;s natural state is white, but when it is exposed to radiation, the composition of the molecule changes giving it a bluish color.  Although, this means the tattoo is actually darker, this accounts for some of the fading.  Besides changing the ink color, solar radiation also causes the body to produce melanin which is on top of the ink.  This tan/brown/black color obscures the ink and in turn makes the tattoo to appear less bright.  Furthermore as most people know, sun exposure destroys tattoos through the body&#8217;s process of repairing the dermal and epidermal damage caused by UVA, UVB and possibly UVC radiation.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/SBWhite.jpg" alt="Starbrite White" width="400" height="336" /></p>
<p>Optical Illusion<br />
Besides all the factors stated above, the more dramatic the difference in color, the less noticeable the fading.  If you look at traditional tattoos they normally have a black outline.  This is done to create a visual barrier between lighter inks and natural skin tone.  Without the separation the tattoo can appear to blend into the surround tissue, giving the appearance of faded tattoo.  Lastly, there is ink absorption.  As already mentioned the body absorbs ink over time.  However, the first month after the tattoo is put into the skin, the body removes ink particles down in the lower levels of the dermis.  Even if white is packed in, there is a very good chance that your body&#8217;s lymphatic system will remove enough of the white to show some fading.  Does sun exposure effect the tattoo during this time?  Sure, but the basic healing period is often just a factor people don&#8217;t take into account and the sun is blamed for the fading of the tattoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/white-tattoos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Police Department to require that officers cover tattoos</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/dallas-police-department-to-require-that-officers-cover-tattoos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/dallas-police-department-to-require-that-officers-cover-tattoos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement. Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tattoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tattoo Ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although tattoo removal is our business, and the new DPD regulation might actually increase our business, I would like to go on record stating the we adamantly oppose the new rule and hope that the department reconsiders. Not only should they allow our men and women in blue to express themselves in the manner they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Although tattoo removal is our business, and the new DPD regulation might actually increase our business, I would like to go on record stating the we adamantly oppose the new rule and hope that the department reconsiders. Not only should they allow our men and women in blue to express themselves in the manner they see fit, but  for their health and well being, not require them to wear long sleeves during the sweltering summer months.</em></strong></p>
<p align="right"><strong><em>-Allen Falkner</em></strong></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/a_ltattoo_1105.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>06:42 AM CDT on Wednesday, July 22, 2009<br />
By TANYA EISERER / <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/">The Dallas Morning News</a><a href="mailto:teiserer@dallasnews.com"><br />
teiserer@dallasnews.com</a></p>
<p>The next time you see a Dallas police officer wearing a long-sleeved shirt when it&#8217;s hotter than a furnace outside, it may be because he or she is hiding something.</p>
<p>A tattoo.</p>
<p>The department is planning to require police officers to cover up their tattoos, even if it means wearing makeup or a skin-colored patch over a hard-to-obscure place such as the neck or wrist.</p>
<p>A lot of officers are coming in with tattoos, said Lt. Andrew Harvey, a police spokesman.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more normal now than it ever has been, he said but added that the department wants officers to display a more professional image.</p>
<p>The department&#8217;s personnel division is drawing up the official policy. It could go into effect as soon as this summer.</p>
<p>The old rules are silent on tattoos and state only that employees must present a neutral and uniform image to effectively relate to all segments of the population they serve.</p>
<p>The department largely left it up to the individual commander to decide whether an officer needed to cover tattoos.</p>
<p>A number of other cities also require officers to cover tattoos, including Los Angeles, Arlington and Houston, though they typically exempt officers working undercover. This is in stride with what other cities are doing, Harvey said.</p>
<p>Officer Nick Novello has four tattoos on his arms, including an American Indian on his right forearm that was there when he was hired by the city in 1982. He said he believes the department should consider grandfathering in current officers and thinks it&#8217;s a mistake to have an across-the-board policy.</p>
<p>If I got hired in 1982 and had that tattoo on my forearm, how can you expect me to cover my tattoo up in 2009? Novello asked. If you have to cover up your arms, they&#8217;re going to have a lot of problems staying hydrated. You put a guy in long sleeves and he&#8217;s not going out of the car unless it&#8217;s an absolute emergency during the hot summer months.</p>
<p>Novello, who also has an eagle bursting out of an American flag on his left arm, said he can understand requiring officers to cover up tattoos if they are offensive in some way.</p>
<p>In culture at large, tattoos are extremely prevalent, he said. We&#8217;re not divorced from society at large.</p>
<p>Another officer, who asked that his name to be published because he feared retaliation, said he&#8217;s worn a long-sleeved uniform for years because his tattoos cover his entire arms. But he said a portion of the tattoos still peeks out on his left hand.</p>
<p>Are they going to make me wear gloves or makeup? he said.</p>
<p>He suggested that a more reasonable approach would be to require officers to cover tattoos if they cover a certain percentage of the body part or if the tattoos are larger than a specified size.</p>
<p>What are you going to do with that guy who is 300 pounds, and you put him in long sleeves in the heat of summer, and he drops out on you? the officer said. There&#8217;s other alternatives than saying everybody with tattoos has to cover it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/dallas-police-department-to-require-that-officers-cover-tattoos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine Bar Removal Project</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/arm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/arm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fade Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hold Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Tattoo Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tattoo Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tattoo Removal Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gradient laser removal project started August 17, 2007 when Adam Walsh of Hold Fast tattooed the bars on the inside of my right arm.  We chose 9 because an approximate spacing of a half-inch seemed to work well aesthetically, and 8 treatments seemed to be a reasonable estimation to remove a black tattoo. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><a href="http://www.fadefast.com/9bar.htm"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/arm450a.jpg" alt="Laser Tattoo Removal" width="450" height="163"></a></p>
<p>The gradient laser removal project started August 17, 2007 when Adam Walsh of <a href="http://www.myspace.com/holdfasttattoos">Hold Fast</a> tattooed the bars on the inside of my right arm.  We chose 9 because an approximate spacing of a half-inch seemed to work well aesthetically, and 8 treatments seemed to be a reasonable estimation to remove a black tattoo.</p>
<p>I began treating the tattoo on September 19, 2007.  This was of course quite soon to start the removal, but the process was as much about experimentation as it was to show my clients how the process worked. As you can see by the first treatment, the ink was quite resilient, breaking down in an uneven fashion.  This result is actually fairly uncommon, usually only seen when treating newer tattoos.  Also, in treatment number two you can see an unusual result.  The white patch on the right side of the bar was from a scab that I accidentally pulled off.  Of course total ink removal is a plus, but I could have been left with a scar.  Thankfully I was not.</p>
<p>Treatments three through five all went as planned with only one constant issue.  The 9th bar, and sometimes number 8, would often blister post treatment.  This was most likely attributed to heat generated by my bicep touching the area when my arm was bent.  Treatment six also went as planned with another minor problem.  Again I accidentally pulled a scab from the area.  This time however the area did not loose color.  In fact, the opposite happened.  The scab was more superficial and the underlying dermis was exposed leaving a very dark area in the tattoo.  It took a few months, but in time the epidermis regenerated and the color evened out.  </p>
<p>Treatments seven and eight went well. I increased the energy quite a bit to knock out as much color as possible. I was a bit more aggressive than normal, but the project was nearing completion and results needed to be more dramatic if possible.  Bar number 9 is not perfect.  There is still a bit of tattoo ink left, the tissue feels slightly different and depending on ambient temperature the area will turn red at times.</p>
<p>The removal project ended with the final laser treatment on February 17, 2009 and the outlines tattooed on April 2, 2009.  Overall I am happy with the final product with one minor exception. As can seen in the photo, the bars that were once straight and symmetrical, have changed shape dramatically as they were progressively treated.</p>
<p>In time the bars will continue to fade and the outlines will soften.  So, in the future I will be updating the photo and possibly the story behind the project.</p>
<p>Credit and Special Thanks to <a href="http://www.staceypotter.com/">Stacy Potter</a> for the photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/arm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1200th Treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/1200th-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/1200th-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Tattoo Removal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday May 19th, 2009 Fade Fast hit an amazing milestone, our 1200th treatment! This achievement is especially significant in that every treatment was performed by Allen Falkner, not an accumulation of treatments by multiple technicians. Below is a before and after shot from our client Chris: (The 1200th treatment was done just after the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday May 19th, 2009 Fade Fast hit an amazing milestone, our 1200th treatment! This achievement is especially significant in that every treatment was performed by <a href="http://www.fadefast.com/Falkner.htm">Allen Falkner</a>, not an accumulation of treatments by multiple technicians. Below is a before and after shot from our client Chris: (The 1200th treatment was done just after the right side of the photo was taken)</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC7fngB.jpg"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC7fngT.jpg" alt="Laser Tattoo Removal" width="450" height="338" /></a></p>
<p>Below you can see a step by step series of images from untreated (top left) to the 8th treatment (bottom right). The white frosting in the last photo is actually a normal post treatment response that disappears 10-15 minutes after the procedure. <a href="http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=6">Click Here</a> for more information on frosting.</p>
<table border="0" width="450" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC0T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC1T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC2T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC3T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC4T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC5T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC6T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC7T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC8T.jpg" alt="Fade Fast Laser Tattoo Removal" width="150" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see, the tattoo is not completely removed, but we are very, very close. Another thing you might notice in the first image is that Chris lost 30 pounds since we first started. Congratulations Chris and thank you for trusting us with your tattoo removal!</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.fadefast.com/images/GC7fngB.jpg"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/1200th-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laser Nano Suturing</title>
		<link>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/laser-nano-suturing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/laser-nano-suturing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irene Kochevar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser Tattoo Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts General Hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano Suturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fadefast.com/blog/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#8217;t long ago that the mention of lasers conjured up images of large-scale weapons that were definitely more science fiction than fact. The Death Star has a formidable array of turbolasers giving it the firepower of greater than half the Imperial starfleet. Planetary disintegration? Doubtful modern lasers will ever be used for that purpose. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t long ago that the mention of lasers conjured up images of large-scale weapons that were definitely more science fiction than fact.</p>
<p align="center"><em>The Death Star has a formidable array of turbolasers giving it the firepower of greater than half the Imperial starfleet.</em></p>
<p>Planetary disintegration? Doubtful modern lasers will ever be used for that purpose. It&#8217;s true that the use of lasers to damage or destroy tissue has become more and more common in the medical field. Even in our business of tattoo removal, we harness the destructive property of laser energy to break down the tattoo ink so the body lymphatic system can remove the foreign particles. However, what about using a laser to create, rather than destroy?</p>
<p>Well, it appears that medical science recently made an amazing breakthrough: <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22088/">Laser-Bonded Nano Suturing</a></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/nanosuturing1.jpg" alt="Nano Suturing" width="450" height="375" /></p>
<p>Irene Kochevar codirects research into healing surgical incisions with laser light at Massachusetts General Hospital.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/nanosuturing2.jpg" alt="Nano Suturing" width="450" height="358" /></p>
<p>After removing a small ellipse of tissue from an anesthetized rabbit, surgeon Ying Wang sews the deeper layers of the wound shut with traditional sutures; the laser that the team uses does not penetrate this deep tissue and so cannot bind it together.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/nanosuturing3.jpg" alt="Nano Suturing" width="450" height="306" /></p>
<p>Wang has closed the right half of the epidermal wound with cosmetic stitches. She then drips Rose Bengal dye onto the left half.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/nanosuturing4.jpg" alt="Nano Suturing" width="450" height="296" /></p>
<p>Wang and surgeon Min Yao position a metal frame that directs a green surgical laser over the incision. The frame keeps the instrument steady and at a measured distance from the skin. They shine the light onto the cut to activate the dye, leaving it on for three minutes.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/nanosuturing5.jpg" alt="Nano Suturing" width="300" height="450" /></p>
<p>A lens in the metal stand modifies the shape of the laser&#8217;s focal point so that it&#8217;s ideal for healing a long, thin surgical incision. Activated by the light, the Rose Bengal stain causes collagen fibers in the skin to link, sealing the wound.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.fadefast.com/images/nanosuturing6.jpg" alt="Nano Suturing" width="450" height="323" /></p>
<p>Once the laser is removed, the left half of the incision remains closed without sutures; it requires no further care and will leave behind almost no scar. The stitches on the right half, however, must remain in place for up to two weeks and will result in small but visible cross-hatch scars.</p>
<p align="center">Story by <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22088/">Lauren Gravitz</a> / Photos by <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22104/">Porter Gifford</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fadefast.com/blog/laser-nano-suturing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
